Some time ago I used to be a mathematical physicist and was fascinated by the extremes of being, which at that time meant the cosmos and the smallest particles.
Now I am realising that "the cosmos" (including multiple universes etc) does not embrace all that is: rather it picks out those those aspects of the whole that can be grasped by physics. Yet at times, and this morning, there is a glimpse that hints of some other.
Reflections on the woods where I live in Southampton and on the (slightly mad) world we all live in. Email cclarke@scispirit.com, Internet http://www.scispirit.com
Tuesday, 27 June 2017
Friday, 23 June 2017
Wednesday, 21 June 2017
Just come from a meeting connected to "scispirit" (i.e. Science and Spirituality), which is also strongly interested in the environment. It was enjoyable,but niggling behind it was the thought: what about transcendence? There were explanations from physics and traditional stories: but what about the inward awareness of the "others" that encircle, define and support our ideas and theories?
Saturday, 17 June 2017
D.I.Y. religion
Dy definition I'm a Christian: I received adult baptism when I was in college; I go to church pretty regularly; I contend that the bare fact of the existence of the universe requires some "thing", one that brings out of nothing (I have speculated on this last idea in 27th May of this blog); and I agree that Jesus had a deep connection with this ultimate being, to the extent that he referred to this source as "Father".
But then I (along, I suspect, with many other people in a similar state) balk at the proposal that Jesus is a fundamental component of god. (That last is not a proper way of talking about the Trinity!)
What I would say is that
first, I must recognise that my own isness, is both in me and for me;
second, that each creature, whereof I can suppose that it has isness, is worthy of respect;
third, that there is no end to being.
But then I (along, I suspect, with many other people in a similar state) balk at the proposal that Jesus is a fundamental component of god. (That last is not a proper way of talking about the Trinity!)
What I would say is that
first, I must recognise that my own isness, is both in me and for me;
second, that each creature, whereof I can suppose that it has isness, is worthy of respect;
third, that there is no end to being.
Thursday, 1 June 2017
If anyone is reading this (if you are, please let me know on
https://mail.google.com/mail/chris@cjsclarke.org ! ) you will have seen my obsession with particular places that draw me, of which the strongest is the an elm tree set back a little from the path along the North side of the Southampton golf course.
It am no longer draws to ecstasy: rather, I now join the tree as an old friend. Its appearance is now smaller, down to my size.
And the stream (mentioned earlier) that I next encounter is ... a stream.
Things are better so.
https://mail.google.com/mail/chris@cjsclarke.org ! ) you will have seen my obsession with particular places that draw me, of which the strongest is the an elm tree set back a little from the path along the North side of the Southampton golf course.
It am no longer draws to ecstasy: rather, I now join the tree as an old friend. Its appearance is now smaller, down to my size.
And the stream (mentioned earlier) that I next encounter is ... a stream.
Things are better so.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)